Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d)

INVESTMENT IN AL MASANE AL KOBRA MINING COMPANY (AMAK)

v2.4.0.6
INVESTMENT IN AL MASANE AL KOBRA MINING COMPANY (AMAK)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
INVESTMENT IN AL MASANE AL KOBRA MINING COMPANY AMAK [Abstract]  
INVESTMENT IN AL MASANE AL KOBRA MINING COMPANY AMAK
NOTE 8 - INVESTMENT IN AL MASANE AL KOBRA MINING COMPANY (“AMAK”)

Until December 2008 the Company had a direct investment in the Al Masane mining project in Najran province of Saudi Arabia, as well as, exploration investment in the Wadi Qatan area near the Al Masane mining project.

AMAK was formed in late 2007 by the Company and seven Saudi investors, and was granted a commercial license from the Ministry of Commerce in January 2008.  The Company formed AMAK with the Saudi investors because the Company recognized that the only way to obtain exploration permits from the Saudi government for the Al Masane and Wadi Qatan properties would be to form a joint venture with a Saudi company.

In December 2008 the Company contributed to AMAK (i) its interests in its Saudi mining properties and (ii) $3,750,000 of costs the Company incurred in connection with the formation of AMAK and the obtaining of necessary licenses for AMAK.  AMAK treated such costs as a contribution from the Company and as organizational costs, which it charged to expense.  AMAK assumed from the Company the liability for the repayment of the $11 million loan from the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Finance and National Economy, and the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Finance and National Economy released the Company from liability for the loan. The Company received a 50% interest in AMAK. The eight Saudi investors contributed $60 million in cash to AMAK for a 50% interest. Under the by-laws of AMAK, the Company was entitled to appoint four of eight members of AMAK's board of directors and the Saudi investors were entitled to appoint the remaining four members of AMAK's board of directors.  However, the by-laws provided that the chairman of AMAK's board, who is appointed by the Saudi investors, casts an extra vote in the event of a tie vote among the eight board members.

The Company accounted for its contribution of these assets to AMAK, net of the $11 million liability, as the contribution of non-monetary assets to a joint venture, and recorded the transfer based on the lower of the cost or market value of the transferred assets. The Company determined that cost was less than market value, with market value being based on the contribution of cash of $60 million by the other investors in AMAK in exchange for their 50% interest.  In addition, the Company confirmed that market value was greater than cost based on the cash flow projections based on the proven reserves and market mineral prices. The Company's initial investment in AMAK was comprised of the following:

       
Accumulated costs of mineral Interests in Saudi Arabia
  $ 40,289,907  
Contribution of AMAK organization costs
    3,712,500  
Loan payable assumed by AMAK
    (11,000,000 )
Net initial investment in AMAK
  $ 33,002,407  

Initially, the Company accounted for its investment using the equity method of accounting under the presumption that since it owned more than 20% of AMAK, the Company would have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of AMAK.

AMAK's by-laws require that audited financial statements for each year ended December 31 be submitted to its stockholders by June 30 of the following year.  As a result, the Company had expected to obtain the audited 2008 financial statements of AMAK by June 30, 2009, and in addition the Company expected to be able to secure the cooperation of AMAK and its auditors in converting those financial statements from generally accepted accounting principles in Saudi Arabia (“Saudi GAAP”) to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). However, by August of 2009 no financial statements of AMAK for 2008 had been produced.
 
During an April 2009 meeting of the Board of Directors of AMAK, a Saudi shareholder and director questioned the validity of the agreements between the Company and several of the Saudi investors which had been relied upon by the Company as the operating document for AMAK since it was signed. The issues raised included: discrepancies between the terms of the original memorandum of understanding and the executed AMAK partnership agreement; an allegation that various signatures for one or more of the Saudi investors on the AMAK partnership agreement were not authorized; that the Saudi attorney that prepared the AMAK partnership agreement exceeded his authority; and whether the Company's capital contribution for its 50% interest in AMAK was fully paid or whether the Company was subject to a call for a $30 million cash contribution to AMAK's capital. The Company had relied upon the AMAK partnership agreement since December 2008.

To settle these disputes, in August 2009 AMAK's shareholders (the Company and the Saudi investors) agreed to amend the articles of association and by-laws for AMAK that provided that (i) the Company would convey nine percent or 4,050,000 shares of AMAK stock to the other AMAK shareholders pro rata, such that the Company's interest in AMAK was now 41%, (ii) the Company has fully and completely paid the subscription price for 18,450,000 shares of AMAK stock (or 41% of the issued and outstanding shares), (iii) neither AMAK nor the other AMAK shareholders may require the Company to make an additional capital contribution without the Company's written consent, (iv) the Company's right to retain  seats on the AMAK Board equal in number to that of the Saudi Arabian shareholders would be limited to the three year period beginning August 25, 2009; (v) AMAK has assumed the $11 million promissory note to the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Finance and National Economy, and AMAK will indemnify and defend the Company against any and all claims related to that note, and (vi) for a three year period commencing August 25, 2009, the Company has the option to repurchase from the Saudi Arabian shareholders 4,050,000 shares of AMAK stock at a price equal to the then fair market value of said shares less ten percent.

In May 2010 the Company received a draft of the 2009 financial statements of AMAK prepared under Saudi GAAP.  At that time, the Company introduced a resolution at a meeting of the AMAK board of directors that would have required AMAK to produce the annual and quarterly financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP that the Company required in order to apply the equity method of accounting for its investment.  The resolution was defeated as the result of the casting of the tie breaking vote described above.

As the result of the events described above the Company concluded since August 2009 that it no longer had significant influence over the operating and financial policies of AMAK, and the Company changed to the cost method of accounting for its investment in AMAK. The Company recorded its cost method investment in AMAK at the carrying amount of its equity method investment at the date the method of accounting was changed.

While the Company was unable to obtain 2008 or 2009 U.S. GAAP financial information for AMAK, based on the Saudi GAAP information it had received it believed that its share of any net income or loss for AMAK for the period from January 1, 2009 to August 2009 would not be material as AMAK's activities during that period were the construction of facilities to begin the commercial development of the interests.  Additionally, because the Company was unable to obtain U.S. GAAP financial information for 2008 or 2009, the Company did not, while it was using the equity method of accounting, record any adjustments for the difference between its investment in AMAK and its share of the book value of AMAK's net assets. For 2008, on the basis of the information the Company was able to obtain, AMAK's activities were limited to the receipt of the contributed assets, and its net loss was comprised solely of the expensing of the $3,712,500 of organizational costs incurred on its behalf by the Company. During 2010 the Company learned that AMAK had recorded Zakat tax expense in 2008 of SR 1,965,000 (approximately USD $525,000).  This tax is not an income tax but rather a tax on equity.  This expense also related to the time period when the investment in AMAK was accounted for under the equity method.  The Company recorded a charge for its 50% share of this expense ($262,500) during 2010 on the basis that its receipt of the information was during 2010.  This information was unavailable when the 2008 and 2009 financial statements were issued; and therefore, caused a revision to the original estimate of the Company's share of AMAK's 2008 net loss.  There was no Zakat for 2009.  A summary of the Company's investment in AMAK is as follows:

Initial investment in AMAK
  $ 33,002,407  
Share of net loss of AMAK
    (1,856,250 )
Share of 2008 Zakat Tax
    (262,500 )
Investment in AMAK at December 31, 2011 and 2010
  $ 30,883,657  
 
In July 2011 Arab Mining Company (“ARMICO”) invested US $37.3 million, acquiring five million shares, or 10% interest in AMAK.  ARMICO also acquired a seat on AMAK's board which is being held by Mr. Sultan Al-Shawli, Saudi Deputy Minister for Petroleum and Minerals. Mr. Al-Shawli's election increased the total number of board members to nine with the Company retaining four.  This transaction changed our ownership percentage in AMAK to 37% and the ownership interest of the Saudi partners to 53%.

As discussed in Note 13, the Company has guaranteed certain of AMAK's bank debt.

In May 2011 we advanced $50,000 on behalf of AMAK as a hiring fee for the general manager of AMAK.  In June 2011we advanced $750,000 to AMAK for interim funding.  The $750,000 was repaid in August 2011.  An additional $70,000 was paid on behalf of AMAK during the fourth quarter of 2011 for marketing advisory services which will be repaid to the Company.  The amount due form AMAK at December 31, 2011, was approximately $120,000 and is included in Prepaid expenses and other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We assess our investment in AMAK for impairment when events are identified, or there are changes in circumstances that may have an adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.  We consider recoverable ore reserves and the amount and timing of the cash flows to be generated by the production of those reserves, as well as, recent equity transactions within AMAK.  No impairment charges were recorded in 2011, 2010, or 2009.